This week, we split into groups and had the opportunity to explore and examine one of four popular IQ tests. My group examined the Stanford-Binet test. I found it to be very interesting, although confusing at times. As I examined the test, I noticed several striking similarities between some of the components and my experiences in other classes.
I spent my first two years at Etown as an early childhood/special education major, and with it, I completed numerous field placements. One such placement, in the spring of my sophomore year, was in an autism support classroom at a local middle school. Several of the students spent class time working one on one with a teacher who used materials very similar to those found in the Stanford-Binet test. The teacher had a stack of cards containing various tasks. Some would prompt the student to answer a question about everyday objects and locations (ex. "What do you do at a restaurant?"). Some of the items on the Binet test strongly reminded me of these prompting activities. I wondered if this teaching style was based on Binet's test, or at least partially drew inspiration from it. Although the presentation of the items were far different, it was still great to be able to see the connection between these two fields.
I was surprised how in depth the IQ tests were. I understand now the training that must go into being able to give these tests. I wonder as an education major turned psychology major, do you think it would be important to teach education majors intelligence and creativity? It may be helpful in teaching young development, especially for special education teachers.
ReplyDelete